Re: I/O operations priority in RTOS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2011-06-05 10:46, Armin Steinhoff wrote:
> Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
>> On Sat, 04 Jun 2011, Monica Puig-Pey wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> I'm studying how to develop drivers in a real time OS and how do they
>>> work. I'm using  Ubuntu 10.04 with the 2.6.31-11-rt patch installed.
>>> I would like to know the priority when executing open(), read(), write()
>>> and close() operations.
>>> In my example the thread which is using the driver runs with 10 RTPRIO,
>>> but I don't know what happens in kernel context with the priority when
>>> running the I/O operations.
>>> Thank you for your help, I don't know where to learn about this.
>>>
>> []
>> Also when using bottom half mechanisms you need to take into account the
>> priority of the kernel thread that manages the defered work items, so
>> rt-drivers may have a different structure than normal drivers.
> 
> That's the reason why I prefer UIO based user space drivers !

...which are forced to use threaded IRQs over -rt as well.

Taking threaded IRQs out of the picture, bottom-half mechanisms usually
come into play when dispatch workload that cannot be assigned to a
specific user context is significant. But then UIO is the wrong approach
anyway as it doesn't match well the requirements of multi-user device
interfaces.

Jan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux