On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 09:25 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 16:29 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 21:47 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > Also, -rt doesn't care since it already has preemptible mmu_gather. > > > > To be fair, he did state: > > > > > In general, This is not a critical latency-path on preemption mode > > > (PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY / PREEMPT_DESKTOP / PREEMPT_RT) > > That doesn't parse for me... what does it say? The only one not listed > is the non-preempt option, that wouldn't reschedule no matter what > ZAP_BLOCK_SIZE. Heh, it didn't parse for me, as I took PREEMPT_DESKTOP and thought it said PREEMPT_NONE. Oh well. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
