Re: Slub support with PREEMPT_RT ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 09:59 +0100, Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
> 
> My real question is the impact of SLUB compared to SLAB on the
> determinism of kmalloc usage and all caches.
> I did some tests using SLUB instead of SLAB on a small (MPC5200 /
> 400Mhz / 16k i-cache and 16k d-cache), and slub seems to be better.
> But I don't know if there is a possibility to tune SLAB in order to
> get good results. 

That's a pretty pointless idea, non of them are deterministic allocators
-- nor can they be, page allocation involves the whole vm reclaim path.

If you want determinism don't allocate memory.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux