Re: preempt rt in commercial use

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> It does not matter whether one system can run circles around the
>> other one as long as any given circle can't be guaranteed to complete
>> in a specified amount of time.
>
> Right -- but the point was, any HW system can fail, too (very, very
> low statistically speaking, but still not 0%). So no system is
> impervious to all sources of breakage.

A hardware failure means that the system is in violation of the system
design.  A soft realtime failure means that reality is in violation of
the system design.

You can't shift the blame to another department by claiming that a
mistake could have happened there as well.

-- 
David Kastrup

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux