On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 18:10 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 16:53 -0700, john stultz wrote: > > > > Hrm. Ok.. I think the line 2100 above gives us a hint: (aparent == anon) > > So if that were the case, we would have already locked aparent and that > > would explain the blowup. > > > > How does it do with the following change? > > Ok, you are on to something. The machine did not crash hard! > But the serial console printed this: Sigh. Its never easy, is it? :) > -------- > BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000008c > IP: [<c045e50a>] rt_spin_lock_fastunlock.clone.2+0x6/0x3e ... > Pid: 2855, comm: nautilus Not tainted > 2.6.33.6-147.rt23.3.fc12.ccrma.i686.rt #3 P5K/EPU/P5K/EPU > EIP: 0060:[<c045e50a>] EFLAGS: 00210246 CPU: 0 > EIP is at rt_spin_lock_fastunlock.clone.2+0x6/0x3e > EAX: 00000078 EBX: ef45393c ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000078 > ESI: ef716edc EDI: 00000000 EBP: f1977c8c ESP: f1977c88 > DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068 preempt:00000000 > Process nautilus (pid: 2855, ti=f1976000 task=f2347130 task.ti=f1976000) > Stack: > ef45393c f1977c94 c0781206 f1977cc8 c04d842e 00000000 ef703e54 faadd5bc > <0> f1977cdc 126bc87a ef703ddc 00000000 ef45393c ef716edc ef6f5494 > faafdc6c > <0> f1977df8 faad9041 c3604b5c faafdc6c ef452bfc 00007e7f f5eb41e8 > 00000007 > Call Trace: > [<c0781206>] ? rt_spin_unlock+0x8/0xa > [<c04d842e>] ? d_materialise_unique+0x210/0x2aa Can you gdb list *0xc04d842e ? Thanks again for all the testing here! Its really appreciated! -john -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
