Re: mq_timedrecieve timeout accuracy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Sujit K M <sjt.kar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Fine.
>
>> Maybe this is why produces a timeout that is inaccurate. Shouldnt it
>> be schedule_hrtimeout ?
>
> Does the RT Patch change anything. OR is it the same.
>

I dont have a vanilla kernel on this piece of hardware. But, I would
guess these numbers are not really expected out of the RT_PREEMPT
kernel ? Im not sure if anyone has run any kind of benchmarks with
ipc's .. message queues in particular.

regards
/prady

-- 
http://www.prady.in
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux