On 07/03/10 21:48, Carsten Emde wrote: > - if (priority > 0) > + if (priority > 1 && !sameprio) > priority--; Unless I'm missing something really obvious, shouldn't this one state: if (priority > 0 && !sameprio) priority--; Or else 1 will be the lowest priority. It's a similar situation in "[PATCH 1/2] add-smp-option-to-ptsematest.patch" as well. kind regards, David Sommerseth -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
