Re: [PATCH] Revert "simplify equal priority logic for cyclictest"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/08/2010 02:18 AM, John Kacur wrote:
> Unfortunately this commit introduces a bug because the priority is not
> retested, and this can result in reported priorities below 0.
> [..]
> I think it can be argued that the original code is also clearer, although
> that is somewhat subjective. With the original code I don't need to track
> down exactly what "sameprio" means, and it is clear what is being tested.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Kacur <jkacur@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Carsten Emde <C.Emde@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux