On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:32:54 +0100 Max Müller <mxmr@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I'd say you're doing pretty good keeping under 50us. You might want to > > try it under a heavier load than the shell script you've been running. > > If you don't want to fool with rteval, try kicking off a kernel compile > > in another window like this: > > > > $ while true; do make -j4 clean bzImage modules; done > > > > and then run cyclictest. A kernel compile with parallel jobs (-j) is a > > good overall load of computation and I/O. > > > > > > I tested now like you told me with irqbalance and cpuspeed services > disabled. I hope i made the right for disabling irqbalance, i used the > kernel parameter acpi_no_irqbalance. Is this correct? Unfortunately the > results were nearly equal as before. I don't think you're going to get much better results on the Atom. I have an MSI Nettop box with the dual-core version and I saw about the same results as you. What sort of scheduling deadlines are you trying to meet? Clark
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
