Re: proposed FAQ entry for rt.wiki.kernel.org (v2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 10:11 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> > > In addition to changing kernel locking, interrupts have been threaded,
> > > meaning that instead of handling interrupts in a special "interrupt
> > > context", each interrupt number has a dedicated thread for running its
> > 
> > s/interrupt number/interrupt line/
> IIRC since .31-rt shared irqs even have one thread for each irq handler.
> I'm not sure this is worth to be metioned though.

Well, that is going mainline too. We can mention that it is on its way,
but only drivers that implement it have it.

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux