[patch -rt 10/17] x86: Add generic aperf/mperf code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



    
Move some of the aperf/mperf code out from the cpufreq driver
thingy so that other people can enjoy it too.
    

Index: linux-2.6.31.4-rt14-lb1/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.31.4-rt14-lb1.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h	2009-10-21 10:47:17.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.31.4-rt14-lb1/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h	2009-10-21 10:48:41.000000000 -0400
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
 #include <linux/cpumask.h>
 #include <linux/cache.h>
 #include <linux/threads.h>
+#include <linux/math64.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
 
 /*
@@ -1010,4 +1011,33 @@
 extern int get_tsc_mode(unsigned long adr);
 extern int set_tsc_mode(unsigned int val);
 
+struct aperfmperf {
+	u64 aperf, mperf;
+};
+
+static inline void get_aperfmperf(struct aperfmperf *am)
+{
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF));
+
+	rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_APERF, am->aperf);
+	rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MPERF, am->mperf);
+}
+
+#define APERFMPERF_SHIFT 10
+
+static inline
+unsigned long calc_aperfmperf_ratio(struct aperfmperf *old,
+				    struct aperfmperf *new)
+{
+	u64 aperf = new->aperf - old->aperf;
+	u64 mperf = new->mperf - old->mperf;
+	unsigned long ratio = aperf;
+
+	mperf >>= APERFMPERF_SHIFT;
+	if (mperf)
+		ratio = div64_u64(aperf, mperf);
+
+	return ratio;
+}
+
 #endif /* _ASM_X86_PROCESSOR_H */
Index: linux-2.6.31.4-rt14-lb1/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.31.4-rt14-lb1.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c	2009-10-21 10:47:17.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.31.4-rt14-lb1/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c	2009-10-21 10:48:41.000000000 -0400
@@ -70,11 +70,7 @@
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct acpi_cpufreq_data *, drv_data);
 
-struct acpi_msr_data {
-	u64 saved_aperf, saved_mperf;
-};
-
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct acpi_msr_data, msr_data);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct aperfmperf, old_perf);
 
 DEFINE_TRACE(power_mark);
 
@@ -243,23 +239,12 @@
 	return cmd.val;
 }
 
-struct perf_pair {
-	union {
-		struct {
-			u32 lo;
-			u32 hi;
-		} split;
-		u64 whole;
-	} aperf, mperf;
-};
-
 /* Called via smp_call_function_single(), on the target CPU */
 static void read_measured_perf_ctrs(void *_cur)
 {
-	struct perf_pair *cur = _cur;
+	struct aperfmperf *am = _cur;
 
-	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, cur->aperf.split.lo, cur->aperf.split.hi);
-	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, cur->mperf.split.lo, cur->mperf.split.hi);
+	get_aperfmperf(am);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -278,63 +263,17 @@
 static unsigned int get_measured_perf(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 				      unsigned int cpu)
 {
-	struct perf_pair readin, cur;
-	unsigned int perf_percent;
+	struct aperfmperf perf;
+	unsigned long ratio;
 	unsigned int retval;
 
-	if (smp_call_function_single(cpu, read_measured_perf_ctrs, &readin, 1))
+	if (smp_call_function_single(cpu, read_measured_perf_ctrs, &perf, 1))
 		return 0;
 
-	cur.aperf.whole = readin.aperf.whole -
-				per_cpu(msr_data, cpu).saved_aperf;
-	cur.mperf.whole = readin.mperf.whole -
-				per_cpu(msr_data, cpu).saved_mperf;
-	per_cpu(msr_data, cpu).saved_aperf = readin.aperf.whole;
-	per_cpu(msr_data, cpu).saved_mperf = readin.mperf.whole;
-
-#ifdef __i386__
-	/*
-	 * We dont want to do 64 bit divide with 32 bit kernel
-	 * Get an approximate value. Return failure in case we cannot get
-	 * an approximate value.
-	 */
-	if (unlikely(cur.aperf.split.hi || cur.mperf.split.hi)) {
-		int shift_count;
-		u32 h;
-
-		h = max_t(u32, cur.aperf.split.hi, cur.mperf.split.hi);
-		shift_count = fls(h);
-
-		cur.aperf.whole >>= shift_count;
-		cur.mperf.whole >>= shift_count;
-	}
-
-	if (((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf.split.lo) {
-		int shift_count = 7;
-		cur.aperf.split.lo >>= shift_count;
-		cur.mperf.split.lo >>= shift_count;
-	}
-
-	if (cur.aperf.split.lo && cur.mperf.split.lo)
-		perf_percent = (cur.aperf.split.lo * 100) / cur.mperf.split.lo;
-	else
-		perf_percent = 0;
-
-#else
-	if (unlikely(((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf.whole)) {
-		int shift_count = 7;
-		cur.aperf.whole >>= shift_count;
-		cur.mperf.whole >>= shift_count;
-	}
-
-	if (cur.aperf.whole && cur.mperf.whole)
-		perf_percent = (cur.aperf.whole * 100) / cur.mperf.whole;
-	else
-		perf_percent = 0;
-
-#endif
+	ratio = calc_aperfmperf_ratio(&per_cpu(old_perf, cpu), &perf);
+	per_cpu(old_perf, cpu) = perf;
 
-	retval = (policy->cpuinfo.max_freq * perf_percent) / 100;
+	retval = (policy->cpuinfo.max_freq * ratio) >> APERFMPERF_SHIFT;
 
 	return retval;
 }

--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux