On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 6:41 AM, Sven-Thorsten
Dietrich<sdietrich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Subject: Fix up "too few parameters to function" build errors in rtmutex
> From: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <sdietrich@xxxxxxx>
>
> Signed-off-by: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <sdietrich@xxxxxxx>
> Index: b/kernel/rtmutex.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/kernel/rtmutex.c
> +++ b/kernel/rtmutex.c
> @@ -1513,7 +1513,8 @@ int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_
>
> mark_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
>
> - if (!rt_mutex_owner(lock) || try_to_steal_lock(lock, task)) {
> + if (!rt_mutex_owner(lock) ||
> + try_to_steal_lock(lock, task, STEAL_NORMAL)) {
> /* We got the lock for task. */
> debug_rt_mutex_lock(lock);
> rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, task, 0);
> @@ -1522,7 +1523,8 @@ int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_
> return 1;
> }
>
> - ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, task, detect_deadlock);
> + ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, task, detect_deadlock,
> + flags);
>
> if (ret && !waiter->task) {
> /*
> Index: b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> @@ -2522,7 +2522,7 @@ ring_buffer_peek(struct ring_buffer *buf
> if (event && event->type_len == RINGBUF_TYPE_PADDING)
> rb_advance_reader(cpu_buffer);
> if (dolock)
> - atomic_)spin_unlock(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock);
> + atomic_spin_unlock(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock);
> local_irq_restore(flags);
>
> if (event && event->type_len == RINGBUF_TYPE_PADDING) {
>
>
Hi Sven
I have to admit I'm scratching my head over this one, I don't see any
rt trees that it applies to. Which version are you referring to here?
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
