> Did you raise the priority for the 1 ms IRQ thread? Sorry, this test was done by one of my team-mate. I should have gathered enough information before mailing. I will check with him and if that was not done, we will try again with raised priority. Then I will get back to the list with more details and queries. However, we did use the nodelay flag while requesting the IRQ. If nodelay flag is used, does the priority still matter? Doesn't the use of this flag make the kernel to treat this interrupt in the traditional way? Are we really making use of any rt capability? Btw, we are testing this on ARM platform. Thanks, Sbs > >> Thanks in advance, >> >> Regards, >> Sbs >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
