On Sun, 25 May 2008, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Sun, 25 May 2008, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > +/* > > + * 5 usec on a 1GHZ machine. Not necessarily correct, but not too long > > + * either. > > And what happens when we have 10GHz boxes that can do migration in 1us, > and the delay that is asked for is 2us. We can return early. I don't like > to place assumptions of this kind that can hurt with future hardware > enhancements. Do the math. It's 500ns on a 10GHz machine then. So nothing to worry about and future proof. Also when those 10GHZ machines arrive the synchronized TSC should have finally become reality. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
