>>> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 8:58 AM, in message <Pine.LNX.4.58.0804230854210.23815@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'm not giving an Ack on this patch (not yet). My main concern here is > that this is performing on a verge of policy change. As you stated, this > is a known issue. One that can be avoided by giving RT tasks different > priorities. It is known that two tasks with the same priority fighting > for the same CPUS (even if one is migratable and one is not) has > non-deterministic behaviour. > > This patch needs a bit of running through the grind to see what effects it > has before going in. Perfectly reasonable stance, Steve. Thanks for the review! -Greg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
