Hi Hiroshi,
Thanks for looking into it. I'll take a deeper look at it later, but
first I have a few nitpicks with the patch.
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/slab.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
> index 4bf6ca8..7beb378 100644
> --- a/mm/slab.c
> +++ b/mm/slab.c
> @@ -138,8 +138,8 @@
> *
> * (On PREEMPT_RT, these are NOPs, but we have to drop/get the irq locks.)
> */
> -# define slab_irq_disable_nort() local_irq_disable()
> -# define slab_irq_enable_nort() local_irq_enable()
> +# define slab_irq_disable_nort(cpu) slab_irq_disable(cpu)
> +# define slab_irq_enable_nort(cpu) slab_irq_enable(cpu)
This is the !PREEMPT_RT version. It should stay as is (with the
exception of ignoring the "cpu" variable. [ (void)cpu; ? ]
#define slab_irq_disable_nort(cpu) \
do { \
(void)cpu; \
local_irq_disable(); \
} while(0)
> # define slab_irq_disable_rt(flags) do { (void)(flags); } while (0)
> # define slab_irq_enable_rt(flags) do { (void)(flags); } while (0)
> # define slab_spin_lock_irq(lock, cpu) \
> @@ -160,8 +160,8 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU_LOCKED(int, slab_irq_locks) = { 0, };
> do { slab_irq_enable(cpu); (void) (flags); } while (0)
> # define slab_irq_disable_rt(cpu) slab_irq_disable(cpu)
> # define slab_irq_enable_rt(cpu) slab_irq_enable(cpu)
> -# define slab_irq_disable_nort() do { } while (0)
> -# define slab_irq_enable_nort() do { } while (0)
> +# define slab_irq_disable_nort(cpu) do { } while (0)
> +# define slab_irq_enable_nort(cpu) do { } while (0)
And these are the PREEMPT_RT version. So basically, this patch is a nop
for PREEMPT_RT. I doubt it will solve your bug ;-)
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
