Re: [PATCH] move PREEMPT_RCU config option back under PREEMPT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 03:06:32AM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> 
> > > > -	bool "Classic RCU"
> > > > +	def_bool !PREEMPT_RCU
> > > >  	help
> > > >  	  This option selects the classic RCU implementation that is
> > > >  	  designed for best read-side performance on non-realtime
> > > > -	  systems.
> > > > -
> > > > -	  Say Y if you are unsure.
> > > > -
> > > 
> > > You can get rid of the "help" part since it isn't visible to users.
> > 
> > So how about if I replace it with comment lines (starting with "#",
> > not with "comment")?
> 
> Actually xconfig can display this text, so using the help like this is 
> fine.

Cool, I will stick with the "help" clause, then.

							Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux