[repost with all folks CCed] On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins.ml@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Are you saying that the modified logic that I introduced is broken? Or > that the original use of the might_sleep() annotation inside this > function is broken? It's probably safe to use, but it's not what its original purpose was and you should use another function/macro. This is an annotation issue and your use of it is inconsistent with how it's used in voluntary preempt. I mentioned it before in a previous post. Folks will correct me if I'm wrong but you should use another macro or function. bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
