K. Prasad wrote: > Hi Ingo, > Please accept these patches into the rt tree which convert the > existing RCU tracing mechanism for Preempt RCU and RCU Boost into > markers. > > These patches are based upon the 2.6.24-rc5-rt1 kernel tree. > > Along with marker transition, the RCU Tracing infrastructure has also > been modularised to be built as a kernel module, thereby enabling > runtime changes to the RCU Tracing infrastructure. > > Patch [1/2] - Patch that converts the Preempt RCU tracing in > rcupreempt.c into markers. > > Patch [1/2] - Patch that converts the Preempt RCU Boost tracing in > rcupreempt-boost.c into markers. > I have a technical problem with marker-based RCU tracing: It causes nasty recursions with latest multi-probe marker patches (sorry, no link at hand, can be found in latest LTTng, maybe also already in -mm). Those patches introduce a marker probe trampoline like this: void marker_probe_cb(const struct marker *mdata, void *call_private, const char *fmt, ...) { va_list args; char ptype; /* * rcu_read_lock does two things : disabling preemption to make sure the * teardown of the callbacks can be done correctly when they are in * modules and they insure RCU read coherency. */ rcu_read_lock(); preempt_disable(); ... Can we do multi-probe with pure preempt_disable/enable protection? I guess it's fine with classic RCU, but what about preemptible RCU? Any suggestion appreciated! Jan PS: You will run into this issue if you try to marry latest -rt with latest LTTng. Straightforward workaround is to comment-out any RCU trace_mark occurrences. -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html