On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Kevin Hilman wrote: > The smc_special_locks should also be used when either softIRQs or hard > IRQs are preempted which may lead to the same problems as under SMP. > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx> > > --- > drivers/net/smc91x.c | 3 ++- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/smc91x.c b/drivers/net/smc91x.c > index f198c49..be62616 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/smc91x.c > +++ b/drivers/net/smc91x.c > @@ -530,7 +530,8 @@ static inline void smc_rcv(struct net_device *dev) > } > } > > -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP > +#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || \ > + defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_SOFTIRQS) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_HARDIRQS) > /* > * On SMP we have the following problem: > * > -- > 1.5.4 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > Nicolas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
