Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> > I'm about to gut the RT latency tracer with the version I'm pushing >> > upstream. This will be some of the changes: >> >> Might I request that you follow the mainline stabilization model and >> wait until the 2.6.25-rcX-rtY series to make a significant change like >> this? >> >> I have nothing against your changes, but am not crazy about seeing >> something like this happen in the "stable" part of the dev cycle. > > ??? - I'm unaware of a stable rt kernel. Neither am I. :) I just meant the stable part of the development cycle. Just as I don't expect any major changes between 2.6.24-rc8 and 2.6.24, I was hoping for no major changest between the -rt patches against these kernels as well. I know the -rt patch has no promises of feature stability or compatibility, hence the humble plea. > But I will grant you. I planned on (and announced this) that > 2.6.24-rt1 will not include the change. OK, I missed that in the announcment. Thanks. > But I'm hoping to use -rt as a place to show that the code is stable > enough for mainline, and that is why I'm pushing so hard for this > now. I want some of the code to be in 2.6.25-rc1. Understood. And thanks for the hard work. I look forward to seeing it in the 2.6.25-rc series too. Thanks, Kevin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
