Re: loadavg vs loadavgrt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Jaswinder Singh wrote:

> Hello,
>
> By linux-2.6.23-rt3 on ideal condition, I am getting :-
>
> root@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:~# cat /proc/loadavgrt
> 1.00 1.00 1.00 0/52 1158

This is bogus. It's a known issue, and there's a patch in the works.
The problem is that the calculation of load average is done via a softirq,
which in vanilla Linux is not a thread (nor an RT task). But in RT, all
softirqs are RT tasks, and when this calculation is performed, it sees
that there is always an RT task runnning. That RT task that it sees
running happens to be the softirq RT task that is calculating the load!

So the numbers are bogus!

-- Steve


> root@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:~# cat /proc/loadavg
> 0.00 0.00 0.02 1/52 1159
> root@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:~#
>
> I am curious:
> 1. Why loadavgrt is not reflecting load on loadavg
>
> 2. loadavgrt is giving correct information or it is bogus
>
> Thank you,
>
> Jaswinder Singh.
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux