On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 02:19 +0200, Ingo Oeser wrote: > Why not make it a task flag, since according to your code, you are only > interested whether this is <= 1 or > 1. Since !(x <= 1) <=> (x > 1) > for any given unsigned integer x, the required data structure is > a "boolean" or a flag. Hi Ingo, You are correct that the data is in fact interpreted as a boolean. I also had considered using a more boolean-like notation at one point. However, I then figured I went through the expense of computing it, I might as well store the actual value as an integer in case it can be used in another way. But to be honest, I cannot really think of any other potential uses, so perhaps we would be best to follow your suggestion. It could always be changed if such a need ever arises. Thank you for the feedback! Regards, -Greg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
