Hi Dmitry,
--
On Sat, 20 Oct 2007, Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
> On 19/10/2007, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > [ ... ]
> > Index: linux-test.git/kernel/sched.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-test.git.orig/kernel/sched.c 2007-10-19 12:32:39.000000000 -0400
> > +++ linux-test.git/kernel/sched.c 2007-10-19 12:33:09.000000000 -0400
> > @@ -300,6 +300,8 @@ struct rq {
> > */
> > unsigned long nr_uninterruptible;
> >
> > + unsigned long rt_nr_running;
>
> could it be a part of the 'struct rt_rq' instead?
Maybe. I didn't really look too hard to where to put it. Currently, in the
-rt patch, it is located in struct rq, so I just did the same. I may be
able to move it.
>
> >
> > +static inline void inc_rt_tasks(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq)
> > +{
> > + if (rt_task(p))
> > + rq->rt_nr_running++;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void dec_rt_tasks(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq)
> > +{
> > + if (rt_task(p)) {
> > + WARN_ON(!rq->rt_nr_running);
> > + rq->rt_nr_running--;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > static void enqueue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wakeup)
> > {
> > struct rt_prio_array *array = &rq->rt.active;
> >
> > list_add_tail(&p->run_list, array->queue + p->prio);
> > __set_bit(p->prio, array->bitmap);
> > +
> > + inc_rt_tasks(p, rq);
>
> why do you need the rt_task(p) check in {inc,dec}_rt_tasks() ?
Me being paranoid ;-)
>
> {enqueue,dequeue}_task_rt() seem to be the only callers and they will
> crash (or corrupt memory) anyway in the case of ! rt_task(p) (sure,
> this case would mean something is broken somewhere wrt sched_class
> handling).
Exactly, I was just being safe. We could add a WARN_ON(!rt_task) there.
-- Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
