On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 23:35 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Daniel Walker wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 14:14 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > > This is the second fix for this .. The first was in this email (over a > > > > month ago) > > > > > > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/31/318 > > > > > > You're right I missed that. (I even read it). But for fixes like this, (or > > > any patches that are not in the tree), you really need to resend the > > > series. > > > > In hindsight I should have resent, but I didn't .. Really it's a matter > > of frustration on my part. Where I submit patches that should be > > included , but they are ignored for no clear reason .. Then I submit > > again, and the patches are ignored again for no clear reason.. > > You were asked to rebase your patches against the latest -rt > kernel. And you bluntly refused to. Nope , I did rebase my patches when Steven asked me to .. > I knew exactly why I ignored the patches when I was moving -rt > forward. Simply because I had not enough time to review them in > detail. Ingo acked them in principle, but we had subtle wreckage from > such changes before and I had no intention to put more risk into a non > trivial merge. > > Sorry, you have provided sloppy patches more than once and requested > us to pick random bugfixes from a broken ftp server or from the > mailing list. It's you who wrote the track record, not us. Oh boy here we go again .. Let just stop right here.. > I'm finally fed up with your prima ballerina attitudes. Either you > want to be part of this project or not. If yes, then please accept > that you are not setting the rules how this works. If no, please stop > whining at us and look for a nice sandpit where you can play these > silly games. > > tglx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
