On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 08:38:49PM +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 09/10, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > --- linux-2.6.22-d-schedclassic/kernel/rcupreempt.c 2007-08-22 15:45:28.000000000 -0700
> > +++ linux-2.6.22-e-hotplugcpu/kernel/rcupreempt.c 2007-08-22 15:56:22.000000000 -0700
> > @@ -125,6 +125,8 @@ enum rcu_mb_flag_values {
> > };
> > static DEFINE_PER_CPU(enum rcu_mb_flag_values, rcu_mb_flag) = rcu_mb_done;
> >
> > +static cpumask_t rcu_cpu_online_map = CPU_MASK_NONE;
>
> I'd suggest to append "__read_mostly"
Makes sense!
> > +void rcu_offline_cpu_rt(int cpu)
> > +{
> > [...snip...]
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&rcu_ctrlblk.fliplock, oldirq);
> > + rcu_check_mb(cpu);
> > + if (per_cpu(rcu_flip_flag, cpu) == rcu_flipped) {
> > + smp_mb(); /* Subsequent counter accesses must see new value */
> > + per_cpu(rcu_flip_flag, cpu) = rcu_flip_seen;
> > + smp_mb(); /* Subsequent RCU read-side critical sections */
> > + /* seen -after- acknowledgement. */
>
> Imho, all these barriers are unneeded and confusing, we can't do them on behalf
> of a dead CPU anyway. Can't we just do
>
> per_cpu(rcu_mb_flag, cpu) = rcu_mb_done;
> per_cpu(rcu_flip_flag, cpu) = rcu_flip_seen;
> ?
You are likely correct, but this is a slow path, extremely hard to
stress test, and I am freakin' paranoid about this sort of thing.
> Why can't we also do
>
> __get_cpu_var(rcu_flipctr)[0] += per_cpu(rcu_flipctr, cpu)[0];
> per_cpu(rcu_flipctr, cpu)[0] = 0;
> __get_cpu_var(rcu_flipctr)[1] += per_cpu(rcu_flipctr, cpu)[1];
> per_cpu(rcu_flipctr, cpu)[1] = 0;
>
> ? This way rcu_try_flip_waitzero() can also use rcu_cpu_online_map. This cpu
> is dead, nobody can modify per_cpu(rcu_flipctr, cpu). And we can't confuse
> rcu_try_flip_waitzero(), we are holding rcu_ctrlblk.fliplock.
Very good point!!! This would reduce latencies on systems where
the number of possible CPUs greatly exceeds that of the number of
online CPUs, so seems quite worthwhile.
> > +void __devinit rcu_online_cpu_rt(int cpu)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long oldirq;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&rcu_ctrlblk.fliplock, oldirq);
> > + cpu_set(cpu, rcu_cpu_online_map);
>
> What if _cpu_up() fails? I think rcu_cpu_notify(CPU_UP_CANCELED) should call
> rcu_offline_cpu_rt() too.
Good catch, will fix!!!
Thanx, Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
