Re: [PATCH] Don't sleep in oops_begin()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 10:05 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > I disagree for the oops case.  You want the simplest possible code
> > > here.
> >
> > If that's true for real time , should be true for mainline right?
> 
> You mean it shouldn't use lockdep etc. there? Yes good point. I can change 
> that

Yes, the oops code path should be as decoupled as possible. We want to
know what happened in the first place and not what consequential damage
is caused by the initial problem.

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux