Re: [PATCH] Fixes spurious system load spikes in /proc/loadavgrt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2007-08-18 at 00:21 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 14:43 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 23:37 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > 
> > > You really start to annoy me. There was a detailed bug description and
> > > the code defect is easy to see. If you neither have the interest nor the
> > > time to look at the actual _trivial_ _self explaining_ patch, then
> > > please look for some other playground to live out your wisenheimer airs
> > > and graces.
> > 
> > I'm not you, and you can't force your opinion of the code on someone
> > else. _I_ don't think it was trivial .. I really couldn't care less if
> > your annoyed or not .. 
> 
> Why is it relevant that you are not me ? 
> 
> I do not force my opinion on someone else, but I simply request that
> you do not force _your_ rules  based on your personal world view on
> people who send _valid_ and _useful_ patches

I made a request , and regardless of my own world, what world are you in
where a request is described as "force _your_ rules" ..

> Also you as the -rt expert who "releases" his own -rt queues should be
> able to recognize the value and correctness of such a patch despite the
> possibly enhanceable text description. If your only comment on such a
> patch consist of your self defined nitpick rules, then you should go
> back and read your own mails where you accused others of scaring off
> developers instead of embracing them.

Again here I make a simple request and I'm "scaring off developers" ..
What your doing right now is scaring off developers ..

> Keep this tone up and you are right on the way to make the second entry
> of my kernel related kill file right behind the lonely dude who managed
> to make it there in 10 years:
> 
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/30/157

I would have thought I was already there as of two years ago.

> > > > If your just going to start flames Thomas take it off list.
> > > 
> > > Flames are only flames when they happen in public.
> > 
> > Not really, but either way flames are _bad_ for business.
> 
> I don't have any business with you.

Great, then we can end this exchange right now, bye.

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux