* Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 08/01, Gregory Haskins wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 02:22 +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > > > No, > > > > You sure are a confident one ;) > > Yeah, this is a rare case when I am very sure I am right ;) > > I strongly believe you guys take a _completely_ wrong approach. > queue_work() should _not_ take the priority of the caller into > account, this is bogus. Oleg, i'd like to make it sure that the role of Gregory Haskins is clear here: he submitted some new infrastructure into the -rt tree, and i reviewed that but found it quite complex and duplicative and suggested him to think about enhancing workqueues with priority properties - which might or might not make sense. It is not the intention of the -rt project to pester any upstream maintainer with -rt issues if that upstream maintainer is not interested in it ... so please just forget about all this if you are not interested in it, we'll sort it out within -rt. Thanks, Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
