On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 22:26 +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > No, the "tail" option has nothing to do with prioritize, we can't remove > it. Please look at the code. So you insert a work struct that executes last which wakes the flushing thread? > Also, flush_workqueue() must not be delayed by the new incoming work_struct's, > the change like this breaks this assumption. True .. Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
