On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 07:59 -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote: > On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 20:52 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote: > > > > > Here's a simpler version .. uses the plist data structure instead of the > > 100 queues, which makes for a cleaner patch .. > > Hi Daniel, > > I like your idea on the plist simplification a lot. I will definitely > roll that into my series. > > I am not too psyched about using the rt_mutex_setprio() API directly, > however. It seems broken to be calling that directly from non rt_mutex > code, IMHO. Perhaps the PI subsystem should be broken out from the > rt_mutex code so it can be used generally? There are other areas where > PI could potentially be used besides rt_mutex (this patch as a prime > example), so this might make sense. rt_mutex_setprio() is just a function. It was also designed specifically for PI , so it seems fairly sane to use it in other PI type situations .. Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
