On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 20:40 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 10:02 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 19:01 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > > We know very well and Ingo nowhere said, that this is not a perfect > > > queue, but it was and still is _our_ work base and we opened it up for > > > the reasons explained. > > > > Easy Thomas .. I was just trying to be helpful .. > > Think for a minute: > > > I haven't really been submitting much to -rt mainly because there was > > no broken out set .. > > Now you expect, that we are completely excited because you condescend to > work with us from one minute to the other ? I'm not "condecending" to anything. I was personally discouraged .. If I was you I'd re-evaluate my position. You should _thrive_ on more developers working with your, instead of trying to discourage people (by sending email like this) .. I won't be discouraged by your nasty emails. Just so this isn't a a totally negative thread, I'll take this opportunity to again thank you and Ingo for release a broken out set. I appreciate it, and I'm sure many other people do as well. Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
