Re: [PATCH -rt] CONFIG_PARAVIRT and CONFIG_MCOUNT don't play well together

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > thanks! I ran into this before and asked for the fastcalls to not be 
> > removed from upstream paravirt.c but to no avail it seems. It does 
> > no harm to anyone to keep the 'fastcall' declarations and 
> > definitions for places where _actual assembly code_ depends on the 
> > calling convention. Could someone please send this upstream-wards 
> > too?
> 
> Yes, I agree, it's actually documenting the subtlety of the calling 
> convention, not just noise in the source.  The upstream patch is 
> different, I'll sort one out.

great!

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux