On 6/17/07, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 11:15 -0500, Nelson Castillo wrote: > > http://rt.wiki.kernel.org > > Not for ARM yet :( > > What should I try for the ARM architecture? ARM has a lot of sub architectures and not all of them are supported yet.
I see.
> There are many choices and > I don't know what is the more friendly. By friendly I mean the one that > is likely to be merged and that cooperate with you. Which choices do you mean ?
I mean implementations. I've seen lot of them but i don't know which one to try (I'm new to RT and the implementation in this thread seems to be very nice).
> http://people.redhat.com/mingo/realtime-preempt/patch-2.6.21.4-rt14 > > : undefined reference to `usecs_to_cycles' > make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 Which ARM sub arch ?
sub arch AT91 -- (Atmel AT91RM9200 processor). Thanks, Nelson.- -- http://arhuaco.org http://emQbit.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
