Re: 2.6.22 - Mission Impossible :-) -

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Why do you need to do this?

On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 01:34 +0200, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I continue with my effort to port last realtime-preempt patch available to
> 2.6.22.
> 
> If i compile without ACPI/hrtimers i don't have any problem (performance
> and stability not tested yet).
> 
> If i compile with these i have a big problem:
> 
> ---[ Cutted form kernel/timer.c ]---
> 
> void msleep(unsigned int msecs)
> {
> 	unsigned long timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(msecs) + 1;
> 	while (timeout)
> 		timeout = schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(timeout);
> }
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> The while construct never return!
> 
> I think that Hrtimer subsystem isn't initialized when msleep called from
> do_probe() (ide subsystem).
> 
> Someone have suggestions?
> 
> Thanks in advance!
> 
> Ciao,
> Alessio
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux