Hi Ted, [added Darren to Cc, as he is working on rt tests] On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:01:06PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: > You mind if I add these to along with your name/conctact to: > > http://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_Patch#Platforms_Tested_and_in_Use_with_CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT > > ... or maybe you could add these platforms yourself? > > I think it would be useful if we had a collated set of tested > platforms on the real-time wiki. I'm sure Peter isn't the only one who > might be interested in this kind of information! Yep, good idea. Nevertheless, I'd like to see a "standardized" measurement process plus nice latency plots, like this one: http://www.pengutronix.de/oselas/realtime/results/20070211-1/phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny-20070211-1.png to have a good comparism base. These plots are basically be done without a sane realtime workload (well, some while true; do find /; done loops, plus ping -f, but that can probably be done better). Any idea for a good realtime workload scenario which is valid to all supported platforms? Robert -- Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 Hannoversche Str. 2, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
