Ingo, Here are some more results:
Nvidia w/cyclesoak
2.6.21-rc5-rt10 938 32%
netperf @51
hardirq @50
softirq @50
Nvidia w/top
2.6.21-rc5-rt12 938 31%
netperf @51
hardirq @50
softirq @50
Hopefully I'll run some more tests in the morning
Thanks,
Dave
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
>
> * dave_sperry@xxxxxxxx <dasperry@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > rt10 shows a big improvement over rt8
> >
> > ##################################################
> > etup Thruput CPU%
> > Nvidia
> > 2.6.21-rc5-rt8 938 65%
> > netperf @51
> > hardirq @50
> > softirq @50
> >
> > Nvidia
> > 2.6.21-rc5-rt10 938 32%
> > netperf @51
> > hardirq @50
> > softirq @50
>
> cool! Btw., could you run the same but without running cyclesoak, and
> only watching the 'idle' metric in 'top' or vmstat? I found in my
> experiments that cyclesoak sometimes interfers with the workload - and
> the idle stats are precise and accurate on -rt. (they are not on
> vanilla)
>
> Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
