Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] media: add v4l2_pipeline_stream_{enable,disable}

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 11:06 AM Helen Koike <helen.koike@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Dafna,
>
> Thanks for working on this.
>
> On 5/22/20 4:55 AM, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote:
> > Hi,
> > This is v4 of the patchset that was sent by Helen Koike.
> >
> > Media drivers need to iterate through the pipeline and call .s_stream()
> > callbacks in the subdevices.
> >
> > Instead of repeating code, add helpers for this.
> >
> > These helpers will go walk through the pipeline only visiting entities
> > that participates in the stream, i.e. it follows links from sink to source
> > (and not the opposite).
> > For example, in a topology like this https://bit.ly/3b2MxjI
> > calling v4l2_pipeline_stream_enable() from rkisp1_mainpath won't call
> > .s_stream(true) for rkisp1_resizer_selfpath.
> >
> > stream_count variable was added in v4l2_subdevice to handle nested calls
> > to the helpers.
> > This is useful when the driver allows streaming from more then one
> > capture device sharing subdevices.
>
> If I understand correctly, this isn't  true anymore right? Nested calls aren't
> possible anymore since this version doesn't contain stream_count in struct v4l2_subdevice.
>
> Documentation of v4l2_pipeline_stream_*() should also be updated.
>
> Just to be clear, without the nested call, vimc will require to add its own
> counters, patch https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10948833/ will be
> required again to allow multi streaming.
>
> Also, patch "media: staging: rkisp1: cap: use v4l2_pipeline_stream_{enable,disable}"
> is cleaner in the previous version (with stream_count in struct v4l2_subdevice).
>
> All drivers that allows multi streaming will need to implement some special handling.
>
> Adding stream_count in struct v4l2_subdevice still seems cleaner to me. I'd like to hear
> what others think.

I certainly would see this reference counting done in generic code,
because requiring every driver to do it simply adds to the endless
amount of boiler plate that V4L2 currently requires from the drivers.
:(

I wonder if it wouldn't be possible to redesign the framework so that
.s_stream() at the subdev level is only called when it's expected to
either start or stop this particular subdev and driver's
implementation can simply execute the requested action.

Best regards,
Tomasz

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip



[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux