Hi Johan, On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 09:33:27AM +0200, Johan Jonker wrote: > A test with the command below gives this error: > > arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3188-bqedison2qc.dt.yaml: > touchscreen@3e: reg:0:0: 56 was expected > > The touchscreen chip on 'rk3188-bqedison2qc' and other BQ models > was shipped with different addresses then the binding currently allows. > Change the reg property that any address will pass. > > make ARCH=arm dtbs_check > DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/ > edt-ft5x06.yaml > > Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.yaml | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.yaml > index 383d64a91..baa8e8f7e 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.yaml > @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ properties: > - focaltech,ft6236 > > reg: > - const: 0x38 > + maxItems: 1 Should we have a list of valid addresses instead of allowing any address? Controllers usually have only a couple of addresses that they support. Thanks. -- Dmitry _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
