Hi Heiko, On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 13:15 -0300, Helen Koike wrote: > From: Shunqian Zheng <zhengsq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Designware MIPI D-PHY, used for ISP0 in rk3399. > > Verified with: > make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-mipi-dphy-rx0.yaml > > Signed-off-by: Shunqian Zheng <zhengsq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Jacob Chen <jacob2.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Helen Koike <helen.koike@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Changes in v2: > - fix alignment of clocks > > V1: > This patchset came from the original ISP series from Rockchip: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10267409/ > Can you take the devicetree changes (patches 8 and 9) ? Thanks, Ezequiel > The only difference is: > - add phy-cells > - update compatible to "rockchip,rk3399-mipi-dphy-rx0" > - commit message > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 11 +++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi > index 33cc21fcf4c10..6b3380b10e596 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi > @@ -1394,6 +1394,17 @@ io_domains: io-domains { > status = "disabled"; > }; > > + mipi_dphy_rx0: mipi-dphy-rx0 { > + compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-mipi-dphy-rx0"; > + clocks = <&cru SCLK_MIPIDPHY_REF>, > + <&cru SCLK_DPHY_RX0_CFG>, > + <&cru PCLK_VIO_GRF>; > + clock-names = "dphy-ref", "dphy-cfg", "grf"; > + power-domains = <&power RK3399_PD_VIO>; > + #phy-cells = <0>; > + status = "disabled"; > + }; > + > u2phy0: usb2-phy@e450 { > compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-usb2phy"; > reg = <0xe450 0x10>; > -- > 2.26.0 > > _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
