Hi Geert-san, Thank you for your comments! > From: Geert Uytterhoeven, Sent: Friday, April 3, 2020 5:28 PM <snip> > > But, I'm thinking this patch (and patch 03/11) should be separated > > from this patch series for arm64 subsystem to ease maintenance. > > My scenario is: > > 1) patch series 1: R-Car PCIe endpoint support. > > -- This means: patch 1, 4 - 9, 11 > > > > 2) After the patch series 1 is merged, submit this patch 2/11 to arm subsystem > > and submit the patch 10/11 to misc subsystem. > > > > 3) At last, submit patch 3/11 after the patch 2/11 is merged. > > > > Geert-san, what do you think? > > Thanks, I agree with your summary. > > I can take patch 2/11 through renesas-devel. > Probably it's best if I submit it to arm-soc as a fix for v5.8, after > the driver part > has been merged into v5.8-rc1, so 3/11 can be submitted for v5.9. Thank you! I got it. > BTW, I'm wondering about "[PATCH v6 05/11] PCI: rcar: Fix calculating > mask for PCIEPAMR register". Can the issue fixed by this patch happen with > the current driver in host mode, or is that limited to ep mode? > In case of the former, please submit it to the PCI maintainer as a separate > fix. Thank you for pointed it out. I think this is the case of the former. IIUC, if such a small window PCIe device exists, the issue happens. Prabhakar-san, is my understanding correct? Best regards, Yoshihiro Shimoda _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
