On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 3:48 PM Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > From: Jagan Teki <jagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 15:07:01 +0530
> >
> > Hi Kever,
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 2:48 PM Kever Yang <kever.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Jagan,
> > >
> > > On 2020/3/31 下午1:59, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 1:06 AM Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >>> From: Jagan Teki <jagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >>> Cc: sunil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, u-boot@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,
> > > >>> linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-amarula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
> > > >>> Jagan Teki <jagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >>> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 23:46:10 +0530
> > > >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Linux supporting assigned-clocks for VOP on rk3399 by assuming
> > > >>> U-Boot not initializing it on this linux commit:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> commit <617f4472bdd3> ("arm64: dts: rockchip: init rk3399 vop clock rates")
> > > >>>
> > > >>> There is no specific need to initialize these assigned clock
> > > >>> in U-Boot as video drivers still work with default aclk and
> > > >>> hclk values. So, these clocks are simply not supported by rk3399
> > > >>> clock driver.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> But, during stdio probe of vidconsole, the device probe
> > > >>> will try to check whether the assigned clocks on that video
> > > >>> console node is initialized or not? and return error if not.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> So, delete these property via -u-boot dtsi as there is
> > > >>> no specific need in U-Boot.
> > > >> Deleting these properties isn't very helpful as it means the U-Boot
> > > >> device tree can no longer be used by the kernel. Isn't it a better
> > > >> idea to implement these clocks as stubs in the u-boot clock driver?
> > > > I did try this before sorting out these changes, seems like it
> > > > requires a bit more tweaking the clock wrt display code. I really
> > > > didn't see any use case as of now for just to print u-boot log on
> > > > display out, and more over this support has been broken since from
> > > > releases. so bypassing these nodes can be a solutions for now.
> > >
> > >
> > > I agree with Mark for not touch the dts first. I don't know the detail
> > > of display driver but:
> > >
> > > - The rk3399 driver use to work without touch dts from kernel;
> > >
> > > - the clock driver have a rk3399_vop_set_clk() which does not depends on
> > > dts.
> >
> > The existing video drivers are written based on the puma dts and those
> > are not inline to Linux dts files, i.e. the reason the code is pushed
> > I think. The rest of rk3399 dtsi files are now inline to Linux as and
> > display out on these are broken from last 2 releases. so my idea is to
> > resolve the things one-after-another like
> > 1. Make existing video stuff work with all rk3399 (this series along
> > with this patch)
> > 2. Drop this patch change and make video drivers working w/o any
> > explicit changes in dts like this patch does.
> >
> > Since step 2, would take time, and require close testing of all boards
> > I would like to pick the existing stuff for the release. Mark my words
> > to fix the things for the next release.
>
> Fair enough. I don't think fixing the issue is too difficult, but it
> is better to do these things in small steps anyway.
I have managed to fix this via clock driver(which seems more
reasonable as per Kever), so this is dropped in v3. thanks for
noticing.
Jagan.
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
