Hello, [dropping Tony Prisk <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from recipients] On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 01:40:28PM +0200, Oleksandr Suvorov wrote: > Thierry, I see the PWM core converts the bit field "third cell" into > the polarity variable. > Now I probably understand your sight and agree that we shouldn't give > the same names to bits in bitfield (dts) and values of a variable. > > But there are lots of useless "0" values of third cell of "pwms" > option in dts files. > > I see 2 ways now: > - just remove all "0" "third cell" from "pwms" options in dts files. I > see this "0" confuses some people. Then you have to overwrite pwm-cells of the provider. If there are two PWMs used from the same provider and only one is inverted this won't work. (Not entirely sure I understood your suggestion.) So I don't like this suggestion. And also in my eyes this isn't clearer, just more complicated to use. > - convert pwm_state.polarity into pwm_state.flags and use bitfield > directly from dtb. > It simplifies the parsing logic and makes adding new flags easier. *shrug*, I don't care much. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ | _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
