Hi Sakari,
On 3/13/20 6:18 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Dafna,
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 04:46:04PM +0100, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote:
>> don't call 'v4l2_async_notifier_parse_fwnode_endpoints_by_port'
>> in order to register async subdevices. Instead call
>> 'v4l2_fwnode_endpoint_parse' to parse the remote endpoints
>> and then register each async subdev with
>> 'v4l2_async_notifier_add_fwnode_remote_subdev'
>>
>> Also remove the relevant item in the TODO file
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/media/rkisp1/TODO | 3 -
>> drivers/staging/media/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c | 94 +++++++++++++----------
>> 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/rkisp1/TODO b/drivers/staging/media/rkisp1/TODO
>> index 0aa9877dd64a..1aa3bb9fd6cb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/media/rkisp1/TODO
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/rkisp1/TODO
>> @@ -1,6 +1,3 @@
>> -* Don't use v4l2_async_notifier_parse_fwnode_endpoints_by_port().
>> -e.g. isp_parse_of_endpoints in drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c
>> -cio2_parse_firmware in drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2.c.
>> * Fix pad format size for statistics and parameters entities.
>> * Use threaded interrupt for rkisp1_stats_isr(), remove work queue.
>> * Fix checkpatch errors.
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c b/drivers/staging/media/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c
>> index d2186856bb24..1035a39f3e49 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/media/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c
>> @@ -233,35 +233,6 @@ static int rkisp1_subdev_notifier_complete(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static int rkisp1_fwnode_parse(struct device *dev,
>> - struct v4l2_fwnode_endpoint *vep,
>> - struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd)
>> -{
>> - struct rkisp1_sensor_async *s_asd =
>> - container_of(asd, struct rkisp1_sensor_async, asd);
>> -
>> - if (vep->bus_type != V4L2_MBUS_CSI2_DPHY) {
>> - dev_err(dev, "Only CSI2 bus type is currently supported\n");
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> - }
>> -
>> - if (vep->base.port != 0) {
>> - dev_err(dev, "The ISP has only port 0\n");
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> - }
>> -
>> - s_asd->mbus_type = vep->bus_type;
>> - s_asd->lanes = vep->bus.mipi_csi2.num_data_lanes;
>> -
>> - /* Parallel bus is currently not supported */
>> - s_asd->parallel_bus_flags = 0;
>> -
>> - if (s_asd->lanes < 1 || s_asd->lanes > 4)
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> -
>> - return 0;
>> -}
>> -
>> static const struct v4l2_async_notifier_operations rkisp1_subdev_notifier_ops = {
>> .bound = rkisp1_subdev_notifier_bound,
>> .unbind = rkisp1_subdev_notifier_unbind,
>> @@ -271,23 +242,68 @@ static const struct v4l2_async_notifier_operations rkisp1_subdev_notifier_ops =
>> static int rkisp1_subdev_notifier(struct rkisp1_device *rkisp1)
>> {
>> struct v4l2_async_notifier *ntf = &rkisp1->notifier;
>> - struct device *dev = rkisp1->dev;
>> + int next_id = 0;
>> int ret;
>>
>> v4l2_async_notifier_init(ntf);
>>
>> - ret = v4l2_async_notifier_parse_fwnode_endpoints_by_port(dev, ntf,
>> - sizeof(struct rkisp1_sensor_async),
>> - 0, rkisp1_fwnode_parse);
>> - if (ret)
>> - return ret;
>> + while (1) {
>
> I might loop over each port here instead.
ISP has a single port (please, see my comment below).
>
>> + struct v4l2_fwnode_endpoint vep = {
>> + .bus_type = V4L2_MBUS_CSI2_DPHY
>> + };
>> + struct rkisp1_sensor_async *rk_asd = NULL;
>> + struct fwnode_handle *ep;
>>
>> - if (list_empty(&ntf->asd_list))
>> - return -ENODEV;
>> + ep = fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id(dev_fwnode(rkisp1->dev),
>> + 0, next_id, FWNODE_GRAPH_ENDPOINT_NEXT);
>
> The port number is always zero, whereas the endpoint id changes on each
> iteration. Is that intended?
Yes, so ISP has a single connection port (a single MIPI-DPHY bus), but hardware can plug more then one
sensor in this port (but only one can be active at a time).
At least this is how I understand how the modeling should be.
And this is how we modeled the device tree bindings:
https://git.linuxtv.org/media_tree.git/tree/drivers/staging/media/rkisp1/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-isp1.yaml#n139
Make sense?
Thanks for reviewing this,
Helen
>
>>
>> - ntf->ops = &rkisp1_subdev_notifier_ops;
>> + if (!ep)
>> + break;
>> +
>> + ret = v4l2_fwnode_endpoint_parse(ep, &vep);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto err_parse;
>> +
>> + rk_asd = kzalloc(sizeof(*rk_asd), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!rk_asd) {
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto err_parse;
>> + }
>> +
>> + rk_asd->lanes = vep.bus.mipi_csi2.num_data_lanes;
>> + rk_asd->mbus_type = vep.bus_type;
>> +
>> + /* Parallel bus is currently not supported */
>> + rk_asd->parallel_bus_flags = 0;
>> + ret = v4l2_async_notifier_add_fwnode_remote_subdev(ntf, ep,
>> + &rk_asd->asd);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto err_parse;
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(rkisp1->dev, "registered ep id %d with %d lanes\n",
>> + vep.base.id, rk_asd->lanes);
>> +
>> + next_id = vep.base.id + 1;
>> +
>> + fwnode_handle_put(ep);
>>
>> - return v4l2_async_notifier_register(&rkisp1->v4l2_dev, ntf);
>> + continue;
>> +err_parse:
>> + fwnode_handle_put(ep);
>> + kfree(rk_asd);
>> + v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup(ntf);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (next_id == 0)
>> + dev_warn(rkisp1->dev, "no remote subdevice found\n");
>
> I guess the driver will be loaded if the module is around and the device
> exists. If the board has no cameras, is that something on which a warning
> should be produced? I'd perhaps use dev_dbg(), if I'd print this at all.
>
>> + ntf->ops = &rkisp1_subdev_notifier_ops;
>> + ret = v4l2_async_notifier_register(&rkisp1->v4l2_dev, ntf);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup(ntf);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + return 0;
>> }
>>
>> /* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
