Hi Mauro, Am Montag, 3. Februar 2020, 23:40:15 CET schrieb Justin Swartz: > Indicate that the rk3228 rga is compatible with that of the rk3288. > > But if any rk3228-specific quirks are identified in future that > require handling logic that differs from what is provided for the > rk3288, then allow for the compatibility string "rockchip,rk3228-rga" > to be matched instead of "rockchip,rk3288-rga". > > Signed-off-by: Justin Swartz <justin.swartz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> what is the process in the media-world for this dt-binding only patch? Do you want to apply it, or should I just also apply it with the following 2 dt-patches? There shouldn't be any conflicts with the media tree as this patch really only affects the rga binding document. Thanks Heiko > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-rga.txt | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-rga.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-rga.txt > index fd5276abf..c53a8e513 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-rga.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-rga.txt > @@ -6,8 +6,9 @@ BitBLT, alpha blending and image blur/sharpness. > > Required properties: > - compatible: value should be one of the following > - "rockchip,rk3288-rga"; > - "rockchip,rk3399-rga"; > + "rockchip,rk3228-rga", "rockchip,rk3288-rga": for Rockchip RK3228 > + "rockchip,rk3288-rga": for Rockchip RK3288 > + "rockchip,rk3399-rga": for Rockchip RK3399 > > - interrupts: RGA interrupt specifier. > > _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
