Quoting Heiko Stuebner (2020-01-29 08:38:19) > From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Instead of open coding the polling of the lock status, use the > handy readl_poll_timeout for this. As the pll locking is normally > blazingly fast and we don't want to incur additional delays, we're > not doing any sleeps similar to for example the imx clk-pllv4 > and define a very safe but still short timeout of 1ms. > > Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
