On Tue, 2020-01-07 at 03:11 +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Helen and Ezequiel, > > Thank you for the patch. > > On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 05:01:06PM -0300, Helen Koike wrote: > > From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Add driver for Rockchip MIPI Synopsys DPHY driver > > > > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Helen Koike <helen.koike@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > Changes in v12: > > - several cleanups > > - remove "rx" from function names, as this driver only supports rx > > > > Changes in v11: > > - fix checkpatch errors > > > > Changes in v10: None > > Changes in v9: > > - Move to staging > > - replace memcpy by a directly assignment > > - remove unecessary ret variable in rockchip_dphy_init > > - s/0x1/1 > > - s/0x0/0 > > - coding style changes > > - dphy_reg variable sizes > > - variables from int to unsigned int > > - rename functions to start with rk_ > > - rename dphy0 to rx > > - fix hardcoded lane0 usage > > - disable rx on power off > > - general cleanups of unused variables > > > > Changes in v8: > > - Remove boiler plate license text > > > > Changes in v7: > > - Migrate dphy specific code from > > drivers/media/platform/rockchip/isp1/mipi_dphy_sy.c > > to drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-dphy.c > > - Drop support for rk3288 > > - Drop support for dphy txrx > > - code styling and checkpatch fixes > > > > drivers/staging/media/Kconfig | 2 + > > drivers/staging/media/Makefile | 1 + > > .../staging/media/phy-rockchip-dphy/Kconfig | 11 + > > .../staging/media/phy-rockchip-dphy/Makefile | 2 + > > drivers/staging/media/phy-rockchip-dphy/TODO | 6 + > > .../phy-rockchip-dphy/phy-rockchip-dphy.c | 396 ++++++++++++++++++ > > 6 files changed, 418 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 drivers/staging/media/phy-rockchip-dphy/Kconfig > > create mode 100644 drivers/staging/media/phy-rockchip-dphy/Makefile > > create mode 100644 drivers/staging/media/phy-rockchip-dphy/TODO > > create mode 100644 drivers/staging/media/phy-rockchip-dphy/phy-rockchip-dphy.c > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/Kconfig b/drivers/staging/media/Kconfig > > index 642adc4c24d2..a47484473883 100644 > > --- a/drivers/staging/media/Kconfig > > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/Kconfig > > @@ -38,4 +38,6 @@ source "drivers/staging/media/ipu3/Kconfig" > > > > source "drivers/staging/media/soc_camera/Kconfig" > > > > +source "drivers/staging/media/phy-rockchip-dphy/Kconfig" > > + > > endif > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/Makefile b/drivers/staging/media/Makefile > > index 2f1711a8aeed..b0eae3906208 100644 > > --- a/drivers/staging/media/Makefile > > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/Makefile > > @@ -8,3 +8,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_TEGRA_VDE) += tegra-vde/ > > obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_HANTRO) += hantro/ > > obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_IPU3_IMGU) += ipu3/ > > obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_CAMERA) += soc_camera/ > > +obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_ROCKCHIP_DPHY) += phy-rockchip-dphy/ > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/phy-rockchip-dphy/Kconfig b/drivers/staging/media/phy-rockchip-dphy/Kconfig > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..7378bd75fa7c > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/phy-rockchip-dphy/Kconfig > > @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only > > +# > > +# Phy drivers for Rockchip platforms > > s/Phy/MIPI D-PHY/ > Ack. > > +# > > +config PHY_ROCKCHIP_DPHY > > + tristate "Rockchip MIPI Synopsys DPHY driver" > > + depends on (ARCH_ROCKCHIP || COMPILE_TEST) && OF > > + select GENERIC_PHY_MIPI_DPHY > > + select GENERIC_PHY > > + help > > + Enable this to support the Rockchip MIPI Synopsys DPHY. > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/phy-rockchip-dphy/Makefile b/drivers/staging/media/phy-rockchip-dphy/Makefile > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..24679dc950cd > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/phy-rockchip-dphy/Makefile > > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > +obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_ROCKCHIP_DPHY) += phy-rockchip-dphy.o > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/phy-rockchip-dphy/TODO b/drivers/staging/media/phy-rockchip-dphy/TODO > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..e1fda55babef > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/phy-rockchip-dphy/TODO > > @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ > > +The major reason for keeping this in staging is because the only driver > > s/major/main/ > What's wrong with "The major reason"? > > +who uses this is rkisp1 who is also in staging. It should be moved together > > s/who uses this/that uses this/ > s/who is also/, which is also/ > > > +rkisp1. > > s/rkisp1/with rkisp1/ ? > I see your point. Let me rephrase it. > > + > > +Please CC patches to Linux Media <linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> and > > +Helen Koike <helen.koike@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>. > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/phy-rockchip-dphy/phy-rockchip-dphy.c b/drivers/staging/media/phy-rockchip-dphy/phy-rockchip-dphy.c > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..c3fe9c64b45f > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/phy-rockchip-dphy/phy-rockchip-dphy.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,396 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT) > > Any reason for this ? Kernel code is usually GPL-2.0. > The ChromeOS driver is originally dual licensed, so we tried to respect that. > > +/* > > + * Rockchip MIPI Synopsys DPHY driver > > + * > > + * Copyright (C) 2019 Collabora, Ltd. > > + * > > + * Based on: > > + * > > + * drivers/media/platform/rockchip/isp1/mipi_dphy_sy.c > > + * in https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel, > > + * chromeos-4.4 branch. > > + * > > + * Copyright (C) 2017 Fuzhou Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd. > > + * Jacob Chen <jacob2.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > + * Shunqian Zheng <zhengsq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > + */ > > + > > +#include <linux/clk.h> > > +#include <linux/io.h> > > +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h> > > +#include <linux/module.h> > > +#include <linux/of.h> > > +#include <linux/of_device.h> > > +#include <linux/phy/phy.h> > > +#include <linux/phy/phy-mipi-dphy.h> > > +#include <linux/platform_device.h> > > +#include <linux/regmap.h> > > + > > +#define RK3399_GRF_SOC_CON9 0x6224 > > +#define RK3399_GRF_SOC_CON21 0x6254 > > +#define RK3399_GRF_SOC_CON22 0x6258 > > +#define RK3399_GRF_SOC_CON23 0x625c > > +#define RK3399_GRF_SOC_CON24 0x6260 > > +#define RK3399_GRF_SOC_CON25 0x6264 > > +#define RK3399_GRF_SOC_STATUS1 0xe2a4 > > + > > +#define CLOCK_LANE_HS_RX_CONTROL 0x34 > > +#define LANE0_HS_RX_CONTROL 0x44 > > +#define LANE1_HS_RX_CONTROL 0x54 > > +#define LANE2_HS_RX_CONTROL 0x84 > > +#define LANE3_HS_RX_CONTROL 0x94 > > +#define LANES_THS_SETTLE_CONTROL 0x75 > > +#define THS_SETTLE_COUNTER_THRESHOLD 0x04 > > + > > +struct hsfreq_range { > > + u16 range_h; > > + u8 cfg_bit; > > +}; > > + > > +static const struct hsfreq_range rk3399_mipidphy_hsfreq_ranges[] = { > > + { 89, 0x00 }, { 99, 0x10 }, { 109, 0x20 }, { 129, 0x01 }, > > + { 139, 0x11 }, { 149, 0x21 }, { 169, 0x02 }, { 179, 0x12 }, > > + { 199, 0x22 }, { 219, 0x03 }, { 239, 0x13 }, { 249, 0x23 }, > > + { 269, 0x04 }, { 299, 0x14 }, { 329, 0x05 }, { 359, 0x15 }, > > + { 399, 0x25 }, { 449, 0x06 }, { 499, 0x16 }, { 549, 0x07 }, > > + { 599, 0x17 }, { 649, 0x08 }, { 699, 0x18 }, { 749, 0x09 }, > > + { 799, 0x19 }, { 849, 0x29 }, { 899, 0x39 }, { 949, 0x0a }, > > + { 999, 0x1a }, { 1049, 0x2a }, { 1099, 0x3a }, { 1149, 0x0b }, > > + { 1199, 0x1b }, { 1249, 0x2b }, { 1299, 0x3b }, { 1349, 0x0c }, > > + { 1399, 0x1c }, { 1449, 0x2c }, { 1500, 0x3c } > > +}; > > + > > +static const char * const rk3399_mipidphy_clks[] = { > > + "dphy-ref", > > + "dphy-cfg", > > + "grf", > > +}; > > + > > +enum dphy_reg_id { > > + GRF_DPHY_RX0_TURNDISABLE = 0, > > + GRF_DPHY_RX0_FORCERXMODE, > > + GRF_DPHY_RX0_FORCETXSTOPMODE, > > + GRF_DPHY_RX0_ENABLE, > > + GRF_DPHY_RX0_TESTCLR, > > + GRF_DPHY_RX0_TESTCLK, > > + GRF_DPHY_RX0_TESTEN, > > + GRF_DPHY_RX0_TESTDIN, > > + GRF_DPHY_RX0_TURNREQUEST, > > + GRF_DPHY_RX0_TESTDOUT, > > + GRF_DPHY_TX0_TURNDISABLE, > > + GRF_DPHY_TX0_FORCERXMODE, > > + GRF_DPHY_TX0_FORCETXSTOPMODE, > > + GRF_DPHY_TX0_TURNREQUEST, > > + GRF_DPHY_TX1RX1_TURNDISABLE, > > + GRF_DPHY_TX1RX1_FORCERXMODE, > > + GRF_DPHY_TX1RX1_FORCETXSTOPMODE, > > + GRF_DPHY_TX1RX1_ENABLE, > > + GRF_DPHY_TX1RX1_MASTERSLAVEZ, > > + GRF_DPHY_TX1RX1_BASEDIR, > > + GRF_DPHY_TX1RX1_ENABLECLK, > > + GRF_DPHY_TX1RX1_TURNREQUEST, > > + GRF_DPHY_RX1_SRC_SEL, > > + /* rk3288 only */ > > + GRF_CON_DISABLE_ISP, > > + GRF_CON_ISP_DPHY_SEL, > > + GRF_DSI_CSI_TESTBUS_SEL, > > + GRF_DVP_V18SEL, > > + /* below is for rk3399 only */ > > + GRF_DPHY_RX0_CLK_INV_SEL, > > + GRF_DPHY_RX1_CLK_INV_SEL, > > +}; > > + > > +struct dphy_reg { > > + u16 offset; > > + u8 mask; > > + u8 shift; > > +}; > > + > > +#define PHY_REG(_offset, _width, _shift) \ > > + { .offset = _offset, .mask = BIT(_width) - 1, .shift = _shift, } > > + > > +static const struct dphy_reg rk3399_grf_dphy_regs[] = { > > + [GRF_DPHY_RX0_TURNREQUEST] = PHY_REG(RK3399_GRF_SOC_CON9, 4, 0), > > + [GRF_DPHY_RX0_CLK_INV_SEL] = PHY_REG(RK3399_GRF_SOC_CON9, 1, 10), > > + [GRF_DPHY_RX1_CLK_INV_SEL] = PHY_REG(RK3399_GRF_SOC_CON9, 1, 11), > > + [GRF_DPHY_RX0_ENABLE] = PHY_REG(RK3399_GRF_SOC_CON21, 4, 0), > > + [GRF_DPHY_RX0_FORCERXMODE] = PHY_REG(RK3399_GRF_SOC_CON21, 4, 4), > > + [GRF_DPHY_RX0_FORCETXSTOPMODE] = PHY_REG(RK3399_GRF_SOC_CON21, 4, 8), > > + [GRF_DPHY_RX0_TURNDISABLE] = PHY_REG(RK3399_GRF_SOC_CON21, 4, 12), > > + [GRF_DPHY_TX0_FORCERXMODE] = PHY_REG(RK3399_GRF_SOC_CON22, 4, 0), > > + [GRF_DPHY_TX0_FORCETXSTOPMODE] = PHY_REG(RK3399_GRF_SOC_CON22, 4, 4), > > + [GRF_DPHY_TX0_TURNDISABLE] = PHY_REG(RK3399_GRF_SOC_CON22, 4, 8), > > + [GRF_DPHY_TX0_TURNREQUEST] = PHY_REG(RK3399_GRF_SOC_CON22, 4, 12), > > + [GRF_DPHY_TX1RX1_ENABLE] = PHY_REG(RK3399_GRF_SOC_CON23, 4, 0), > > + [GRF_DPHY_TX1RX1_FORCERXMODE] = PHY_REG(RK3399_GRF_SOC_CON23, 4, 4), > > + [GRF_DPHY_TX1RX1_FORCETXSTOPMODE] = PHY_REG(RK3399_GRF_SOC_CON23, 4, 8), > > + [GRF_DPHY_TX1RX1_TURNDISABLE] = PHY_REG(RK3399_GRF_SOC_CON23, 4, 12), > > + [GRF_DPHY_TX1RX1_TURNREQUEST] = PHY_REG(RK3399_GRF_SOC_CON24, 4, 0), > > + [GRF_DPHY_RX1_SRC_SEL] = PHY_REG(RK3399_GRF_SOC_CON24, 1, 4), > > + [GRF_DPHY_TX1RX1_BASEDIR] = PHY_REG(RK3399_GRF_SOC_CON24, 1, 5), > > + [GRF_DPHY_TX1RX1_ENABLECLK] = PHY_REG(RK3399_GRF_SOC_CON24, 1, 6), > > + [GRF_DPHY_TX1RX1_MASTERSLAVEZ] = PHY_REG(RK3399_GRF_SOC_CON24, 1, 7), > > + [GRF_DPHY_RX0_TESTDIN] = PHY_REG(RK3399_GRF_SOC_CON25, 8, 0), > > + [GRF_DPHY_RX0_TESTEN] = PHY_REG(RK3399_GRF_SOC_CON25, 1, 8), > > + [GRF_DPHY_RX0_TESTCLK] = PHY_REG(RK3399_GRF_SOC_CON25, 1, 9), > > + [GRF_DPHY_RX0_TESTCLR] = PHY_REG(RK3399_GRF_SOC_CON25, 1, 10), > > + [GRF_DPHY_RX0_TESTDOUT] = PHY_REG(RK3399_GRF_SOC_STATUS1, 8, 0), > > +}; > > + > > +struct rk_dphy_drv_data { > > + const char * const *clks; > > + unsigned int num_clks; > > + const struct hsfreq_range *hsfreq_ranges; > > + unsigned int num_hsfreq_ranges; > > + const struct dphy_reg *regs; > > +}; > > + > > +struct rk_dphy { > > + struct device *dev; > > + struct regmap *grf; > > + struct clk_bulk_data *clks; > > + > > + const struct rk_dphy_drv_data *drv_data; > > + struct phy_configure_opts_mipi_dphy config; > > + > > + u8 hsfreq; > > +}; > > + > > +static inline void rk_dphy_write_grf(struct rk_dphy *priv, > > + unsigned int index, u8 value) > > +{ > > + const struct dphy_reg *reg = &priv->drv_data->regs[index]; > > + /* Update high word */ > > + unsigned int val = (value << reg->shift) | > > + (reg->mask << (reg->shift + 16)); > > + > > + WARN_ON(!reg->offset); > > Maybe > > if (WARN_ON(!reg->offset)) > return; > Right. > > + regmap_write(priv->grf, reg->offset, val); > > +} > > + > > +static void rk_dphy_write(struct rk_dphy *priv, > > + u8 test_code, u8 test_data) > > +{ > > + /* > > + * With the falling edge on TESTCLK, the TESTDIN[7:0] signal content > > + * is latched internally as the current test code. Test data is > > + * programmed internally by rising edge on TESTCLK. > > + */ > > + rk_dphy_write_grf(priv, GRF_DPHY_RX0_TESTCLK, 1); > > Do we need this first line, as the function always exits with TESTCLK=1, > and TESTCLK is initialized to 1 before calling rk_dphy_write for the > first time ? > You might be right. Perhaps we can test if it's fine to drop it, and put a comment saying TESTCLK must be =1 here, so the assumption is clearly stated. > > + rk_dphy_write_grf(priv, GRF_DPHY_RX0_TESTDIN, test_code); > > + rk_dphy_write_grf(priv, GRF_DPHY_RX0_TESTEN, 1); > > + rk_dphy_write_grf(priv, GRF_DPHY_RX0_TESTCLK, 0); > > + rk_dphy_write_grf(priv, GRF_DPHY_RX0_TESTEN, 0); > > + rk_dphy_write_grf(priv, GRF_DPHY_RX0_TESTDIN, test_data); > > + rk_dphy_write_grf(priv, GRF_DPHY_RX0_TESTCLK, 1); > > +} > > + > > +static void rk_dphy_enable(struct rk_dphy *priv) > > +{ > > + rk_dphy_write_grf(priv, GRF_DPHY_RX0_FORCERXMODE, 0); > > + rk_dphy_write_grf(priv, GRF_DPHY_RX0_FORCETXSTOPMODE, 0); > > + > > + /* Disable lane turn around, which is ignored in receive mode */ > > + rk_dphy_write_grf(priv, GRF_DPHY_RX0_TURNREQUEST, 0); > > + rk_dphy_write_grf(priv, GRF_DPHY_RX0_TURNDISABLE, 0xf); > > + > > + rk_dphy_write_grf(priv, GRF_DPHY_RX0_ENABLE, > > + GENMASK(priv->config.lanes - 1, 0)); > > + > > + /* dphy start */ > > + rk_dphy_write_grf(priv, GRF_DPHY_RX0_TESTCLK, 1); > > + rk_dphy_write_grf(priv, GRF_DPHY_RX0_TESTCLR, 1); > > + usleep_range(100, 150); > > + rk_dphy_write_grf(priv, GRF_DPHY_RX0_TESTCLR, 0); > > + usleep_range(100, 150); > > + > > + /* set clock lane */ > > + /* HS hsfreq_range & lane 0 settle bypass */ > > + rk_dphy_write(priv, CLOCK_LANE_HS_RX_CONTROL, 0); > > + /* HS RX Control of lane0 */ > > + rk_dphy_write(priv, LANE0_HS_RX_CONTROL, priv->hsfreq << 1); > > + /* HS RX Control of lane1 */ > > + rk_dphy_write(priv, LANE1_HS_RX_CONTROL, priv->hsfreq << 1); > > + /* HS RX Control of lane2 */ > > + rk_dphy_write(priv, LANE2_HS_RX_CONTROL, priv->hsfreq << 1); > > + /* HS RX Control of lane3 */ > > + rk_dphy_write(priv, LANE3_HS_RX_CONTROL, priv->hsfreq << 1); > > + /* HS RX Data Lanes Settle State Time Control */ > > + rk_dphy_write(priv, LANES_THS_SETTLE_CONTROL, > > + THS_SETTLE_COUNTER_THRESHOLD); > > + > > + /* Normal operation */ > > + rk_dphy_write(priv, 0x0, 0); > > +} > > + > > +static int rk_dphy_configure(struct phy *phy, union phy_configure_opts *opts) > > +{ > > + struct rk_dphy *priv = phy_get_drvdata(phy); > > + const struct rk_dphy_drv_data *drv_data = priv->drv_data; > > + struct phy_configure_opts_mipi_dphy *config = &opts->mipi_dphy; > > + unsigned int i, hsfreq = 0, data_rate_mbps = config->hs_clk_rate; > > Maybe one variable per line ? > Yeah. > > + int ret; > > + > > + /* pass with phy_mipi_dphy_get_default_config (with pixel rate?) */ > > + ret = phy_mipi_dphy_config_validate(config); > > + if (ret) > > + return ret; > > I would add a blank line here. > > > + do_div(data_rate_mbps, 1000 * 1000); > > data_rate_mbps is an unsigned int, so you can use > > data_rate_mbps /= 1000 * 1000; > > However, you're potentially truncating hs_clk_rate by assigning it to > data_rate_mbps, so I would remove the assignment at declaration time and > do > > data_rate_mbps = div_u64(config->hs_clk_rate, 1000 * 1000); > > or define data_rate_mbps as an unsigned long. > Ah, good catch. > > + > > + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "lanes %d - data_rate_mbps %u\n", > > + config->lanes, data_rate_mbps); > > + for (i = 0; i < drv_data->num_hsfreq_ranges; i++) { > > + if (drv_data->hsfreq_ranges[i].range_h >= data_rate_mbps) { > > + hsfreq = drv_data->hsfreq_ranges[i].cfg_bit; > > + break; > > + } > > + } > > + if (!hsfreq) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + priv->hsfreq = hsfreq; > > + priv->config = *config; > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static int rk_dphy_power_on(struct phy *phy) > > +{ > > + struct rk_dphy *priv = phy_get_drvdata(phy); > > + int ret; > > + > > + ret = clk_bulk_enable(priv->drv_data->num_clks, priv->clks); > > + if (ret) > > + return ret; > > + > > + rk_dphy_enable(priv); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static int rk_dphy_power_off(struct phy *phy) > > +{ > > + struct rk_dphy *priv = phy_get_drvdata(phy); > > + > > + rk_dphy_write_grf(priv, GRF_DPHY_RX0_ENABLE, 0); > > + clk_bulk_disable(priv->drv_data->num_clks, priv->clks); > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static int rk_dphy_init(struct phy *phy) > > +{ > > + struct rk_dphy *priv = phy_get_drvdata(phy); > > + > > + return clk_bulk_prepare(priv->drv_data->num_clks, priv->clks); > > +} > > + > > +static int rk_dphy_exit(struct phy *phy) > > +{ > > + struct rk_dphy *priv = phy_get_drvdata(phy); > > + > > + clk_bulk_unprepare(priv->drv_data->num_clks, priv->clks); > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static const struct phy_ops rk_dphy_ops = { > > + .power_on = rk_dphy_power_on, > > + .power_off = rk_dphy_power_off, > > + .init = rk_dphy_init, > > + .exit = rk_dphy_exit, > > + .configure = rk_dphy_configure, > > + .owner = THIS_MODULE, > > +}; > > + > > +static const struct rk_dphy_drv_data rk3399_mipidphy_drv_data = { > > + .clks = rk3399_mipidphy_clks, > > + .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(rk3399_mipidphy_clks), > > + .hsfreq_ranges = rk3399_mipidphy_hsfreq_ranges, > > + .num_hsfreq_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(rk3399_mipidphy_hsfreq_ranges), > > + .regs = rk3399_grf_dphy_regs, > > +}; > > + > > +static const struct of_device_id rk_dphy_dt_ids[] = { > > + { > > + .compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-mipi-dphy", > > + .data = &rk3399_mipidphy_drv_data, > > + }, > > + {} > > +}; > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rk_dphy_dt_ids); > > + > > +static int rk_dphy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > +{ > > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > > + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; > > + const struct rk_dphy_drv_data *drv_data; > > + struct phy_provider *phy_provider; > > + const struct of_device_id *of_id; > > + struct rk_dphy *priv; > > + struct regmap *grf; > > + struct phy *phy; > > + unsigned int i; > > + int ret; > > + > > + if (!dev->parent || !dev->parent->of_node) > > + return -ENODEV; > > + > > + if (platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0)) { > > + dev_err(dev, "Rockchip DPHY driver only suports RX mode\n"); > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > + > > + priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL); > > + if (!priv) > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + priv->dev = dev; > > + > > + grf = syscon_node_to_regmap(dev->parent->of_node); > > + if (IS_ERR(grf)) { > > + grf = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node, > > + "rockchip,grf"); > > Is this for backward compatibility with older bindings ? Do we still > need it ? If so I would add a comment to explain why. > Right. I think this might end up being required, depending on how the bindings end up loooking like. > With the above small issues fixed, > > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Thanks, Ezequiel _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
