On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 15:46:35 +0000 Hugh Cole-Baker <sigmaris@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Boris, > > > On 13 Dec 2019, at 12:54, Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Now that the core provides generic reflist builders, we can use them > > instead of implementing our own. > > > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Changes in v3: > > * New patch > > --- > > drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_h264.c | 237 +-------------------- > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 229 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_h264.c b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_h264.c > > index 568640eab3a6..d998272d20e6 100644 > > --- a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_h264.c > > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_h264.c > > @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ > > */ > > > > #include <linux/types.h> > > -#include <linux/sort.h> > > +#include <media/v4l2-h264.h> > > With this patch, CONFIG_VIDEO_HANTRO needs to depend on CONFIG_V4L2_H264, > without that it can encounter linking errors due to missing symbols for > v4l2_h264_init_reflist_builder, etc. Oops, you're right (I didn't notice it since I had it selected by CONFIG_VIDEO_ROCKCHIP_VDEC). I'll fix that in v4. Thanks, Boris _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
