Hi, Am Montag, 9. Dezember 2019, 14:37:28 CET schrieb Peter Geis: > On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 8:29 AM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 06/12/2019 6:45 pm, Anand Moon wrote: > > > Most of the RK3399 SBC boards do not perform clean > > > shutdown and clean reboot. > > > > FWIW reboot problems on RK3399 have been tracked down to issues in > > upstream ATF, and are unrelated to the PMIC. > > > > > These patches try to help resolve the issue with proper > > > shutdown by turning off the PMIC. > > > > As mentioned elsewhere[1], although this is what the BSP kernel seems to > > do, and in practice it's unlikely to matter for the majority of devboard > > users like you and me, I still feel a bit uncomfortable with this > > solution for systems using ATF as in principle the secure world might > > want to know about orderly shutdowns, and this effectively makes every > > shutdown an unexpected power loss from secure software's point of view. > > > > Robin. > > Since ATF is operating completely in volatile memory, and shouldn't be > touching hardware once it passes off control to the kernel anyways, > what is the harm of pulling the rug out from under it? Secure-world doesn't end with ATF :-) There can also be an instance of OP-TEE or another TEE on top and they often actually do secure storage encrypted onto the hosts mass storage (see kernel's optee module). > If this idea is to prevent issues in the future, such as if ATF does > gain the ability to preempt hardware control, then at that time ATF > will need to be able to handle actually powering off devices using the > same functionality. > > But as we discussed previously, ATF doesn't have this capability, so > in this case any board without a dedicated power-off gpio will be > unable to power off at all. > Also it seems that giving ATF this functionality, with the current > state of ATF, would be cost prohibitive. > > I personally feel that allowing the kernel to do this is a solution to > the problem we have now. For the rest I guess I'll just point to Robin's text and Ack under your system-power-controller patch ;-) Heiko > > [1] > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-rockchip/2019-December/028183.html > > > > > For reference > > > RK805 PMCI data sheet: > > > [0] http://rockchip.fr/RK805%20datasheet%20V1.3.pdf > > > RK808 PMIC data sheet: > > > [1] http://rockchip.fr/RK808%20datasheet%20V1.4.pdf > > > RK817 PMIC data sheet: > > > [2] http://rockchip.fr/RK817%20datasheet%20V1.01.pdf > > > RK818 PMIC data sheet: > > > [3] http://rockchip.fr/RK818%20datasheet%20V1.0.pdf > > > > > > Reboot issue: > > > My guess is that we need to some proper sequence of > > > setting to PMCI to perform clean. > > > > > > If you have any input please share them. > > > > > > Tested on SBC > > > Rock960 Model A > > > Odroid N1 > > > Rock64 > > > > > > -Anand Moon > > > > > > Anand Moon (8): > > > mfd: rk808: Refactor shutdown functions > > > mfd: rk808: use syscore for RK805 PMIC shutdown > > > mfd: rk808: use syscore for RK808 PMIC shutdown > > > mfd: rk808: use syscore for RK818 PMIC shutdown > > > mfd: rk808: cleanup unused function pointer > > > mfd: rk808: use common syscore for all PMCI for clean shutdown > > > arm64: rockchip: drop unused field from rk8xx i2c node > > > arm: rockchip: drop unused field from rk8xx i2c node > > > > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3036-kylin.dts | 1 - > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3188-px3-evb.dts | 1 - > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-evb-rk808.dts | 1 - > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-phycore-som.dtsi | 1 - > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-popmetal.dts | 1 - > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-tinker.dtsi | 1 - > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron.dtsi | 1 - > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-vyasa.dts | 1 - > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/rv1108-elgin-r1.dts | 1 - > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/rv1108-evb.dts | 1 - > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-evb.dts | 1 - > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328-a1.dts | 1 - > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328-evb.dts | 1 - > > > .../arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328-roc-cc.dts | 1 - > > > .../arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328-rock64.dts | 1 - > > > .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3368-geekbox.dts | 1 - > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3368-lion.dtsi | 1 - > > > .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3368-px5-evb.dts | 1 - > > > .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts | 1 - > > > .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-hugsun-x99.dts | 1 - > > > .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi | 1 - > > > .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-leez-p710.dts | 1 - > > > .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-nanopi4.dtsi | 1 - > > > .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts | 1 - > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-puma.dtsi | 1 - > > > .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi | 1 - > > > .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-pi-4.dts | 1 - > > > .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock960.dtsi | 1 - > > > .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dts | 1 - > > > .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-sapphire.dtsi | 1 - > > > drivers/mfd/rk808.c | 144 +++++------------- > > > include/linux/mfd/rk808.h | 2 - > > > 32 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 134 deletions(-) > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-rockchip mailing list > > Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip > _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
