On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 12:55:02PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 04:28:50PM +0000, Andrew Murray wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 01:43:39PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: > > > On Tue, 2019-11-19 at 12:30 +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: > > > > Hi Andrew, thanks for the review. > > > > > > +/** > > > > > > + * __roundup_pow_of_two64() - round 64bit value up to nearest power of > > > > > > two > > > > > > + * @n: value to round up > > > > > > + */ > > > > > > +static inline __attribute__((const)) __u64 __roundup_pow_of_two64(__u64 > > > > > > n) > > > > > > > > > > To be consistent with other functions in the same file (__ilog_u64) you may > > > > > want to rename this to __roundup_pow_of_two_u64. > > > > > > > > Sounds good to me. > > > > > > > > > Also do you know why u64 is used in some places and __u64 in others? > > > > > > > > That's unwarranted, it should be __u64 everywhere. > > > > > > Sorry, now that I look deeper into it, it should be u64. > > > > Do you know the reason why? I'd be interested to know. > > __u64 must be used in header files that are under uapi - ie it is the > name of the symbol in userspace, and u64 does not exist. > > u64 should be used in all code that is only inside the kernel, ie .c > files, internal headers, etc > > I routinely discourage use of __uXX in kernel native code. Thanks for this, much appreciated! Andrew Murray > > Jason _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
